Iraq Vote Significant in Defining Congress’ Role
February 17th, 2007
Historically this is very significant. Sadly, Congress does not assert its responsibilities nearly as often as it should in foreign policy, and particularly where war is concerned. So to have a significant majority of the House—almost all of one party and a sizeable chunk of the president’s own party—register strong disagreement with a major decision of this sort is really quite significant.
It doesn’t end here. We will, I hope, move on to further legislation, but this is a very significant vote. I know the Republicans tried to mock it by saying, “Oh, well, it’s not important because it’s non-binding�—actually, I was kind of pleased by that in a way because it admitted what Bush and Cheney have not previously admitted: namely, that some of what we do is binding. They’ve tended to treat everything as non-binding, including the law.
Secondly, the Republicans themselves have forced us to bring out these resolutions. We’re a democracy; expressions of public opinion by people elected to represent the country are important. As I said it’s not the end of the process, but it’s a very important beginning.
Permalink | Comment on this post (0)
By

